Fighting Climate Change and Protecting Clean Air
We’re living in a time of climate destabilization: historic heat waves and droughts, bizarre cold snaps that disrupt farming, and massive hurricanes that produce destructive flooding and drive people from their homes. Despite these recurring crises, our federal government appointed an EPA administrator with the explicit mission of dismantling policies and programs instituted to reduce fossil fuel use and build a renewable and sustainable future. We are waging legal battles to halt this anti-climate agenda and fighting ill-advised pollution-producing projects at the local level.
Halting the Raid on Connecticut’s Ratepayer Funds
Leticia Colon de Mejias, Connecticut Fund for the Environment, et al v State of Connecticut (Federal Court for the District of Connecticut)
Connecticut electric customers pay into state funds for energy efficiency and clean energy programs—programs intended to save money for families, clean the air we breathe, and spur economic growth. But in October 2017 , the state government unconstitutionally diverted $155 million of those ratepayer funds to plug an unrelated budget gap.
That’s why on May 15, 2018 we filed a federal lawsuit against the State of Connecticut demanding the funds’ return. Our co-plaintiffs and partners in this fight include Leticia Colon and Efficiency for All, clean energy trade group Solar Connecticut, consumer rights groups Fight the Hike and CCAG, and additional efficiency and solar businesses.
Despite the active lawsuit, the money was formally transferred into the general fund on June 25, 2018. We’re continuing to press the case on an expedited schedule through summer 2018.
Requiring Pruitt’s EPA to Control Coal Plant Emissions
Connecticut v Pruitt (Federal Court for the District of Connecticut)
In May 2017, Connecticut filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court against the EPA for failure to take timely action on a petition to stop pollution from a Pennsylvania coal-fired power plant that blows into New York, Connecticut, and New England. CFE intervened as a party to the action, both on behalf of itself and as local counsel to Sierra Club.
Pollution from these coal plants significantly contributes to Connecticut’s greenhouse gas and ozone pollution, causing irreparable harm to Connecticut residents’ health and environment.
In February 2018 we got a federal court order requiring the EPA to hold a hearing to determine whether the plant should install controls. After that ruling, in a separate proceeding in Pennsylvania, the plant agreed not to burn coal in certain seasons starting in 2028. We did not participate in this separate agreement and supported the Attorney General and DEEP as they argued for stronger controls in a public hearing in D.C.
Stopping New Natural Gas Plants in Connecticut
NTE Connecticut, LLC v. Siting Council (New Britain Superior Court)
When NTE Connecticut, LLC tried to build a gas-fired power plant in Killingly, a low-income, environmental justice community already plagued by power plant pollution, we challenged it. The plant was unneeded and construction of the generating facility and associated natural gas pipeline would cause substantial environmental damage. After a hearing, the Connecticut Siting Council denied the project. NTE appealed the Siting Council’s final decision to the Superior Court; CFE appeared to defend the decision. Then, in February 2018, NTE withdrew its appeal after ISO-New England found for a second time that the grid doesn’t need additional power from the proposed plant. NTE may try again, so we are staying vigilant. You can find an article about the power plant here.